Wednesday, April 6, 2011

REFERENCES

REFERENCES

1.      van Zanten A, 2001, 'Bosch ESP Systems: 5 Years of Experience', SAE Paper
2000-01-1633, Warrendale
2.      Electronic stability control could prevent nearly one-third of all fatal crashes and reduce rollover risk by as much as 80%; effect is found on single- and multiple-vehicle crashes," IIHS News release, 2006
3.      Stability Control", Mitsubishi Motors website
6.      www.wikipedia.com//esc/Electronic Stability Control
7.      Bosch, 2005. '10 years of ESP® from Bosch: More driving safety with the
Electronic Stability Program', http://www.bosch-presse.de/ 16 Feb 2005
8.      Electronic Stability Control, GM

CONCLUSIONS

3.1  SUMMARY
One of the best definitions of Electronic Stability Contol is:
“Computerized technology that improves the safety of a vehicle's stability by detecting and minimizing skids”
Factors and activities that make to Electronic Stability Control interverns:
“ESC intervenes only when it detects loss of steering control, i.e. when the vehicle is not going where the driver is steering”
Problem With ESC
  • a)      Understeer
  • b)      OverSteer

In the field
  • a)      Advantages
  • b)      New Concept
  • c)      Case Study


3.2  RECOMMENDATIONS
Consumers should be recommended to buy cars with ESC, and automotive industry should only market cars with ESC as quickly as possible. Such a policy statement has increased the fitment rate on new. Further studies should be made, to validate the results of the present study, and increase the understanding of the mechanism of the improvement.

2.3 CASE STUDY

Electronic Stability Control - Review of Research and Regulations
Recent analysis of real world accidents in the USA, Japan and Europe suggests that Electronic Stability Control (ESC) can be remarkably effective at preventing loss-of-control accidents. Regulatory authorities and consumer test organisations around the world are therefore actively researching test methods that can be used to assess the performance of ESC. Researchers in the USA, Canada, Europe, Japan and Australia were contacted to establish the status of research and to obtain comments on ways in which ESC can be assessed and encouraged.
Methods of operation      
There are potentially many ways that ESC could detect instability and intervene to maintain control. The simplest form detects when the vehicle is failing to follow the intended course, as indicated by the angle of the steering wheel, and applies a small amount of braking to an appropriate road wheel to provide a compensating moment that brings the vehicle back on course. The following diagrams are from a Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, IIHS Status Report.




An SAE paper by Van Zanten (2000) contains a detailed description of ESC components and functions. Van Zanten, from Robert Bosch GmbH (the major supplier of ESC) discusses the abnormal conditions for which ESC must be designed and tested: "Changes in the tire and car data such as resulting from usual wear and tear or even from small accidents must not reduce the ESP performance or at least must not result in adverse behaviour. Before the system is released, a catalog of special test manoeuvres must be checked. Flat tires and trailers should be included in the catalog. Also the “Moose Test” has become a part of the catalog. Particularly at low ambient temperatures where fast active braking is hampered by the increasing viscosity of the brake fluid the interventions must be checked to be fast enough to achieve the required yaw moment on the car in time. "

The SAE J2564 defines ESC as having the following functions:
  • *      Is computer controlled and the computer contains a closed-loop algorithm designed  to limit    understeer and oversteer of the vehicle.
  • *      Has a means to determine vehicle yaw velocity and side slip.
  • *      Has a means to monitor driver steering input.
  • *      Has a means of applying and adjusting the vehicle brakes to induce correcting yaw torques to the vehicle.
  • *      Is operational over the full speed range of the vehicle (except below a low-speed threshold where loss of control is unlikely).